Performing Arts

Part of: blogs.walkerart.org

by Jeff at 7:49 am 2008-05-10
Filed under:
0 Comments

BOMB Magazine has posted a web-preview of Meg Stuart and Catharine Sullivan’s conversation which will be printed in full in their Summer ‘08 edition. I can’t wait to read it in its entirety - such a smart pairing of artists investigating cross-disciplinary art practices.

I love when Meg says “What about bodies in crisis? Bodies that are not in control? What about complex physical and emotional states? Is it possible to give these irrational bodies a platform to address contemporary issues while embracing a theatrical context?” It was clear that she was investigating these questions in her brown shag-carpet fantasy world of Forgeries, Love, and Other Matters (possibly my favorite show from the 05-06 season)

If you’re having a hard time remembering Forgeries, check out the Performing Arts department’s submission to the annual pumpkin carving contest.

Excerpt from Catherine Sullivan on Art21

 
by Michèle Steinwald at 2:26 pm 2008-05-08
Filed under:
1 Comment

Twin Cities dance community members 4/22/2008

To launch 2008’s National Dance Week, an email to many in Minnesota’s dance community went out to invite all members to participate in a group photo shoot. The turn out was great! We luckily had a beautiful sunshine-filled afternoon as 24 people made it out to the Minneapolis Sculpture Garden.

First annual Twin Cities National Dance Week photo includes:
Patrick Scully (artist), Judith Brin Ingber (dancer), Alanna Morris (dancer), Sarah LaRose-Holland (dancer), Bryan Gerber (dancer, teacher, choreographer), Chris Holman (dance enthusiast), Laurie Van Wieren (dance maker), Sher Demeter (dancer, acupuncturist), Paula Mann (choreographer), Matthew S. Smith (composer), Karen Sherman (dance artist), Sarah Petersen (artist), Chris Schlichting (dance artist), Morgan Thorson (choreographer), April Sellers (choreographer), John Munger (choreographer, teacher, researcher), Lisa Conlin (choreographer, dancer), Cathy Wright (choreographer), Christopher Watson (choreographer), Dylan Skybrook (choreographer), Jennifer Johanneson (dance enthusiast), Rebecca Frost (artist), Michèle Steinwald (arts manager), Philip Bither (curator), and behind the camera, Cameron Wittig (photographer). Also present in paper form on the grass: Megan Mayer (dance artist), and Anna Marie Shogren (dance maker).

Next year, we hope to double the turn out and for even more the following years until EVERYONE is represented! Stay in touch with next year’s schedule and photo shoot date online at mnartists.org/danceweek.

As the 2008 NDW wraps up and after participating in a full week plus of activities, I find myself still running around the cities and seeing local dance performances almost every night. It is proof that we have a vibrant, lively, and rich dance community in Minnesota!

See you at the shows!

 
by Emily Taylor at 2:21 pm 2008-04-22
Filed under:
0 Comments

Trisha Brown
This Wednesday, April 23rd Trisha Brown an icon of contemporary dance will be on Midmorning with Kerri Miller.
Tune in to 91.1 at 9 AM or Click here to listen.

This Friday’s Dance Performance by Trisha Brown’s Dance Company will include music/score by John Cage and Laurie Anderson.
click here for tickets

 
by Matt Peiken at 1:12 pm 2008-04-18
Filed under:
0 Comments

To launch an exhibition of her drawings at the Walker, Trisha Brown performed on paper Thursday night — drawing in the Medtronic Gallery with cameras rolling and an audience packing the Walker Cinema to watch her process as it happened.

 
by Matt Peiken at 1:47 pm 2008-04-17
Filed under:
0 Comments

Trisha Brown has spent much of this week at the Walker Art Center working with local dancers on the nuances of her choreography and preparing to perform a drawing tonight to launch an exhibition of her works on paper, So That the Audience Does Not Know Whether I Have Stopped Dancing. On Wednesday, in the Walker’s Medtronic Gallery, Brown coached a handful of Twin Cities dancers — Emily Johnson, Sally Rousse, Morgan Thorson and Galen Treuer among them — to work out the curves of Brown’s 1968 piece Planes. Brown’s own company performs April 25 at Northrop Auditorium.

 

I liked all the pieces that made up Feedforward. Eve Beglarian’s trombone score, a great mix of high school fanfare, cow noise, and ominous color; Karinne Keithley’s funny text; Kara Feely’s costumes, track suits dotted with sketches of glitter; the overall visual design, credited to a slew of people. I liked Neumann’s choreography–the slower bits more than the sport collisions, actually, the aestheticized tennis strokes, the ballet arms that flick or pop to something different, the deliberate strokes.
And I especially enjoyed the performers: Nead Medlyn and Matt Citron’s perfect comic timing, Andrew Dinwiddie’s solemnly hip-wiggling referee. Among some more conventionally beautiful movers, Taryn Griggs stood out. The beauties (long-limbed, athletic types) sometimes go right through their well-extended lines, but Griggs fills hers out. She has that quality which is often called intention: she appears to have generated the movement herself, to be making the decisions just as we watch her. I hear that Griggs is moving to town this summer–lucky us.
So I liked it all, and I mostly enjoyed myself. All the same, I didn’t find a coherent whole here, or anything particularly inventive on the large scale. A lot of desires and ideas appear to have gone into this, with the unfortunate result that the various desires and ideas overlap and erase each other. For example, I wanted to concentrate on the dancing but the voice-over had me more on the lookout for the next joke. I can imagine plenty of good things emerging from this, as the various collaborators either go their separate ways or pare down their joint art, and I had a perfectly enjoyable evening watching Feedforward, but I didn’t feel that chill of encounter, of change.

 
by Matt Peiken at 4:11 pm 2008-01-22
Filed under:
2 Comments

The New York Times reports that, starting next month, the Merce Cunningham Dance Company will show Mondays With Merce, an online video program featuring weekly episodes of the choreographer’s Monday class, on its Web site. As theTimes reports:

The program has three major components. First, there will be 26 episodes online beginning in September. Each will include 30 to 40 minutes of technique class, edited and supplemented with interviews with Mr. Cunningham, collaborators like the artists Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg and some of the original dancers from the pieces, and archival material. The episodes will show the inspiration for dances and reveal the threads that link one work to another.

"If the company is performing 'Ocean,' which is based on the circle," said Nancy Dalva, a dance historian who will be directing these edited episodes, "we can go get archival footage of 'Beach Birds,' which has the same circle in it, and show the same Matisse poster, which Merce saw in his dentist's office before he made the dance."

Cunningham and his entire troupe are performing Ocean Sept. 11-13 inside a granite quarry just outside of St. Cloud, Minn.

 
by Matt Peiken at 10:52 am 2008-01-03
Filed under:
0 Comments

Before stepping into the great unknown of the Walker’s Out There 20, you might want to get a leg up by scanning these reviews of the artists we’re bringing here over the next four weekends:

miguel-gutierrez_5.jpgMiguel Gutierrez and the Powerful People, Everyone (Wednesday-Saturday, January 9-12):

The New York Times (March 2007)

The Brooklyn Rail (April 2007)

The Village Voice (March 2007)

the-team_1.jpgThe TEAM, Particularly in the Heartland (Thursday-Saturday, January 17-19)

Time Out New York (March 2007)

The Edinburgh (U.K.) Scotsman (August 2006)

The New York Sun (July 2006)

claude-wampler_5.jpgClaude Wampler, PERFORMANCE (career ender) (Thursday-Saturday, January 24-26)

The Brooklyn Rail (January 2007)

The New York Times (November 2006) - part of a longer trend piece by John Rockwell. Scroll toward the end to read about Wampler.

BLURB: The New Yorker (November 2006)

david-neumann_3.jpgDavid Neumann/advanced beginner group, Feed Forward (Thursday-Saturday, January 31-February 2)

The New York Times (October 2007)

Off Off Off Dance (November 2007)

Counter Critic (October 2007)

 
by natalie at 3:50 pm 2007-12-06
Filed under:
0 Comments

It is that time of year when the Walker welcomes four emerging performance groups to Minneapolis for Out There 20: Moving Toward the Future. This unique festival of talent will not only be on stage but you the audience member have the chance to work with them one on one! Along with performing their work throughout January these artists are offering you a chance to learn more about their process in four fantastic Saturday morning workshops! Get inside Out There with these innovative performers!

Saturday, January 12, 2008 11am-1pm Miguel Gutierrez and the Powerful People - Help Gutierrez create “The Big Mess” a movement based experiment. Open to all this workshop is part performance based, part experience, and a true investigation into the making of something from nothing. Click www.miguelgutierrez.org to learn more about their work.

Saturday, January 19, 2008 11am-1pm The TEAM - What are the challenges and wonders of creating a performance work with an ensemble? Be prepared to write and move with these performers as you explore their techniques when it comes to building dramatic material within a democracy. Find out more about this group at www.theteamplays.com.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 11am-1pm Claude Wampler - Join Wampler and ArtForum contributing editor Bruce Hainley for a rare screening of Andy Warhol’s 66-minute film Paul Swan. After viewing be part of an engaging conversation about topics spurred by the film such as aging of a performer’s body, the meaning of a career and its ending, and more. Learn about Wampler at www.claudewampler.com.

Saturday, February 2, 2008 11am-1pm David Neumann/advanced beginner group - This workshop offers participants the opportunity to discuss the difficulties and joys that come with a multidisciplinary approach to dance and theater. Movement experience is necessary and a performance background is encouraged. Go to www.advancedbeginnergroup.org for more.

The logistics: All workshops are $6 ($4 Walker members) Series of four $20 ($12 Walker members). All workshops are held in the McGuire Theater. Early sign up is encouraged! Call 612-375-7600 or go to walkerart.org/tickets!

 
by Paul Schmelzer at 12:30 pm 2007-11-26
Filed under:
1 Comment

heatandlife1.jpgWhile searching for links to go along with last week’s Behind the 8-Ball Q&A with Emily Johnson, curator of this weekend’s successful Choreographers’ Evening, I noticed that her Walker/Jerome-commissioned work Heat & Life is on a 50-state tour. And given the performance’s theme — climate change and its implications on how we live — the company is buying carbon offsets to help reduce its carbon footprint.

I emailed Johnson to hear what it means to be “carbon neutral.” In her reply she said that oft-used buzzword is too forgiving. “To be truly carbon neutral” — that is to add no carbon dioxide to the atmosphere in the course of touring — “we’d be walking to our performance cities and venues and performing in the dark,” she wrote.

Still, from paying for tree planting to doing roadside theater to raise awareness of the issue, Johson’s company Catalyst is truly putting its money where its moves are.

More from her email:

(more…)

 
by Michèle Steinwald at 5:27 pm 2007-11-24
Filed under:
64 Comments

(on behalf of Emily Johnson)

What do you remember?
What surprised you?
Did you laugh? Did you cry?
Did your mind wander?

post-re-view is a post-performance project of Catalyst.

I am interested in what happens when audiences are invited to craft a response to a performance, especially when they weren’t preparing for that task during the show. What stays in the mind? What is recalled? What is lost? Does any of this change the relationship between “review,” “reviewer,” “audience,” and “performance?”

Now that you’ve seen the 35th annual Choreographers’ Evening, please write, draw, videotape (or anything else you can think of) a response to any one or any number of the dances you saw tonight.

Add your response as a comment to this post. Your response will be housed on the Walker site and also linked to www.catalystdance.com. This project is not to be confused with the Walker blog's Re:view-Overnight Observations. Note: this is not a blogging situation.

A few liberal post-re-view guidelines:

- post-re-views can be of any length

- post-re-views can take any shape the contributor chooses; essay, quick response, prose, lists, drawings, short film…

- People are asked to create post-re-views AFTER shows

- post-re-views are not edited

- These post-re-views will be posted on the Walker's website and on Catalyst’s website

- post-re-view-ers need not have any prior experience writing about, performing, or making “dance.”

Thank you!!
-Emily Johnson
Tonight's Curator and Director of Catalyst

 

This post refers to Galen’s post and Sally’s reply a bit, but I thought I’d separate it because I have a slightly different take.

First, I just finished my review of this for mnartists.org. Look for the review on Monday. I approached the performance from the cultural angle–what does this say about our ability to view dances from other cultures, etc–and I’m not going to rehash that in this post.

Like Sally, I wondered about the dialogue. How much were these two actually talking to each other? I got the sense that very little was actually going on during the performance–in two ways. First, they’ve certainly performed this plenty of times, and they have a routine, if not a script. But even taking the conversation at face value, would you really call that a conversation? Bel and Klunchun mostly refusing to understand each other, with only moments of artistic sympathy–really, it depressed me.

Also like Sally, I got stuck on this idea of risk versus purchase. The sniffy classicist in me wants to respond that there’s nothing wrong with knowing in advance what you are getting, that this is akin to the vital processes of rereading and revisiting, that knowing the outlines of what you’re getting prepares you to see more of the inside this time–and also that continually seeking new stimulation is characteristic of children and drug addicts. But I don’t think, on reflection, that Bel meant to rank gambling above purchasing.

Gambling–is that really what you feel you’re doing when you buy a Walker ticket? “They didn’t buy anything!” Bel exclaimed when explaining why disgruntled viewers don’t get their money back. All they bought was a chance. There’s something to that, isn’t there?

Speaking of disgruntled viewers, I did see a few people leaving before the end, and frankly I didn’t blame them. It was quite long for a lecture-dem type of thing, and I thought mostly aimed at the dance/contemporary performance crowd.

 
by Matt Peiken at 12:31 pm 2007-11-15
Filed under:
3 Comments

I fought the urge to walk out of my first encounter with Jérôme Bel. It was The Show Must Go On at the Pantages (through the Walker), in 2001, a show featuring a wide line of everyday/ordinary people facing and returning the blank stares of the audience and intermittently breaking into dull interpretations of club dancing. I don’t remember much else about the night, beyond thinking I’d probably never seen a show more insulting to its audience.

I likely would have relegated the evening to a dark and distant brain cell if not for Wednesday’s opening of Pichet Klunchun and Myself, the tell-and-show Bel has crafted with the Thai dancer named in the title. Bel and Klunchun sit in chairs facing one another from opposite sides of the stage. Bel interviews Klunchun about his art and Klunchun answers — sometimes cryptically, sometimes revealingly, sometimes demonstratively — before the two reverse roles. I didn’t make the connection with the evening of six years ago until Bel played David Bowie’s “Let’s Dance” to illustrate his artistic motives. The 20-watt bulb flickered over my head — Ooooh, it’s THAT guy.

Bel and Klunchun are different breeds of minimalists, and their show is all about exposing the audience to their divergent artistic processes, from conception to construction to production. There’s a formal informality to their conversation — the most basic of questions lead to complicated blueprints, all delivered with an understated, patient pace that meshes well with the artists’ metabolisms.

Klunchun moves with the relaxed control of a cat, his movements so deliberate, subtle and precise that, in one work, he distinguishes one character from another by changing the relationship of his chin to his extended fingers. The audience gasped when Klunchun pulled his fingers back to make contact with the top of his forearm and again with his revelation that a complete performance, uninterrupted, would last one week.

My favorite moment of the evening came when Klunchun moved from a back corner of the stage toward the center, time seeming to stop not only between strides but during his strides. The room fell so silent that I could only hear a lone person breathing. I thought perhaps someone nearby had fallen asleep until I realized the breaths were coming from Klunchun, amplified through his body microphone.

By contrast, nothing about Bel is exacting. He took the stage Wednesday as if he’d just woken up, and even Klunchun, in his loosely scripted side of the conversation, seemed taken aback by Bel’s approach. I know this was a performance — how much truth Bel laced into his comments, I’m not sure — but Bel articulated a flippant if comical disregard for his audience. The rules of contemporary art, he said, allow him the freedom to do anything he wishes, audience be damned — and don’t bother asking for a refund. If that means lip-syncing through a song or doing nothing at all but standing there, returning the audience’s stare, well, he inferred, that’s art.

I now have context for what I’d too easily disregarded six years ago. Bel is all about effect — he wants to remove any sense of art (or, more specifically, artists) as rare, privileged or gifted. Rather, he tells Klunchun (and, by extension, his audience), he wants people watching his work to feel that “anyone can do this.” Mission accomplished. But there’s a uniqueness to how Bel delivers this message. When he plays the song “Killing Me Softly,” rather than dance, he takes the run of the song to illustrate his own death. Even Klunchun, in his scripted revelation, sees the artistry.

Pichet Klunchun and Myself is illuminating, captivating, funny and, particularly for Bel, brave. Positioning himself alongside a dancer of Klunchun’s caliber could only further cast Bel as an artistic layabout. But I came away awestruck with one artist and forgiving of the other, questioning my own boundaries of what is and isn’t art.

 
by Philip Bither at 1:03 pm 2007-11-13
Filed under:
1 Comment

I just returned from New York where it seemed everyone involved in modern dance or contemporary art was talking (or perhaps "raving" is more accurate) about the Jérôme Bel project that won over full houses at Dance Theater Workshop and was the unanimous critical hit of the Performa '07 visual art-performance festival. In last Friday's New York Times Jennifer Dunning called Jérôme Bel and Pichet Klunchun's performance "funny, touching and provocative... (which) says a great deal about the subtleties of skilled performing and the nature of dance." She went on "the fascination of the must-see Pichet Klunchun and Myself should come as no surprise to anyone familiar with Mr. Bel's career" (full review below.)

Alas, this difficult-to-describe (or at least difficult-to-make-interesting-sounding) show has not yet fully found its audience and I am afraid it will come and go quickly and many will regret not making a point to come. The piece speaks directly to our artistic times, turning a seemingly simple exchange into an illumination of issues spanning globalization, conceptual art, cross-cultural understanding, post-modern dance, the place of tradition in artistic practice and other key subjects. And, Jérôme and Pichet do all this in the most witty, sometimes moving, often beguiling ways.

I think the work also helps illuminate where contemporary dance, performance work and even conceptual visual art practice has been heading in recent years. In other words, seeing this work I think helps one gain a different kind of understanding around other artists also coming to the Walker - from Miguel Gutierrez (opening Out There) to Romeo Castellucci, from Tino Sehgal (exhibition opens in December) to Back to Back Theater (June '08).

I recently scanned reviews and on-line comments from other international cities (the piece is only making three stops in America) where this two-year old work has toured and could not find a single negative response. One critic picked it as her favorite show of the massive 2006 Melbourne Festival (involving scores of remarkable projects). Another, a guy writing on the "countercritic" web site was perhaps my favorite. He began by summing up how many people probably felt when they read descriptions of the work before seeing it:

"When I walked into the theater and I saw two chairs facing each other, separated by about 20 feet, two bottles of water and a laptop, I was sure this was going to be an utter disaster, a pretentious piece of shit, and something unduly excruciating that I would not be able to escape..." Instead, he says he found "an altogether mesmerizing and soul-filling experience...It's also very entertaining, and it communicates massive amounts of information, in a way that works of art cannot always communicate on their own. This is art about art. Dance about dance. And, mainly, its about today." click here to read the rest of this thoughtful review.

Jerome and Pichet

click here for tickets

 
by Michèle Steinwald at 2:08 pm 2007-11-07
Filed under:
2 Comments

Jérôme Bel was last here is 2005 with his funny, still talked about, twist on pop culture, exciting dance performance The show must go on and is coming back in less than two weeks to present his next piece. Although I wasn't in Minneapolis in 2005, it is one of the events in Walker’s performing arts history that I hear about repeatedly from local dance community artists and audience members, so I am wondering if someone could write about what they saw, their memories and impressions on its success to help explain the context of his work for others who may have missed it? It will especially help in relation to his upcoming, deceptively simple, witty, conversation/performance Pichet Klunchen and Myself.

I have already seen this work when it premiered in France and am so excited to see it again that I giggle to myself when recalling the questions Jérôme dares to ask Pichet on stage. I can't believe his straightforward innocence and how he asks all the questions I would never have the courage to say out loud. I won't spoil it for you now so I'm happy to chat more afterwards so FYI shows are November 14 and 15 at 8pm in the Walker's McGuire theater and 2-for-1 tickets are available online by clicking here or at the box office by requesting the ‘Killing me Softly’ special!

 
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress