Blogs The Green Room Re:View-Overnight Observations

Sympathetic Spaces: Grouper at Sound Horizon

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Thursday’s Sound Horizon concerts by Grouper. Agree [...]

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Thursday’s Sound Horizon concerts by Grouper. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

I got to the Walker a bit early for the Sound Horizon performance by Grouper (aka Liz Harris) and checked out, among other things, Abraham Cruzvillegas: The Autoconstucción Suites exhibition. On one of the walls was a quote from Buckminster Fuller (although my own research hasn’t turned up its source): “Matter should be organized by sympathy.”

That, combined with Cruzvillegas’ simultaneously overpowering and intimate structures, had me thinking about sympathetic spaces (To whom? For whom? To what?) and what makes up these spaces. The Sound Horizon series has offered a wonderful venue for such explorations in sound, held as it is in the Perlman Gallery, a space which can offer its own collaborative voices, be they sonic or visual, to an artist.

grouper

Grouper. Photo: Justin Schell

Last night’s trio of sets by Grouper marked the end of this season’s Sound Horizon series. “Grouper,” of course, is also a type of fish, but Harris’ name choice lends a different valence to what she does. It’s a clunky name, really, but her music is anything but: it has a much more intricate, almost woven, texture to it, with the digital gauze of her guitar and vocals meshing seamlessly with the pre-recorded ambiences and drones, some of which are created through loops played on a tape recorder. While the set I saw was mostly songs linked together by beds of noise that sounded like they could have been, at some point in their sonic life, water waves, Harris conceived of the performances as a triptych, moving from structure to abstraction, with the last set comprised almost entirely of tape collages.

Truth be told, Grouper’s music was made much better by the space surrounding it, both the cavernous quality it gave to her already-reverbed sounds, but also the immersive, multi-projected videos of Bruce Nauman’s MAPPING THE STUDIO II with color shift, flip, flop, & flip/flop (Fat Chance John Cage). While the projections were nearly static, almost “night-vision” shots, what you saw were the other beings who lived in the space: a black cat, mice, bugs. These beings would dart across the screen seemingly in all directions (“flip” is an editing term for turning a piece of footage upside down, while “flop” means to make the footage perspectivally backwards). These seven screens surrounded the audience, offering a different type of immersion, simultaneously providing a sharp visual counterpoint to the music.

There wasn’t any specific stage lighting (the illumination came from the Nauman images), meaning that Harris herself was enveloped in the same light (or non-light) as the audience. There was, however, an archaic light fixture that reached out from the desk, and its luminosity swelled with specific sonic moments. My friend said it looked like a firefly, and Grouper’s music certainly had the kind of meditative, but also slightly melancholic, character of the end of a summer’s day, as if those flashes of light represented by the bugs in Nauman’s studio were carefully drawn out and set to music. In the end, I’m not sure what might have been the objects or agents of sympathy in Grouper’s organizations of sonic matter. Flipping to another meaning of the word, and away from whatever intentions she might have had, the evening was more about sympathetic resonances (sonic and otherwise) between the evening’s multiple spaces—structural, sonic, and visual.

 

Masterful Taborn’s Magical Homecoming

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, musician and Making Music host James Everest shares his perspective on [...]

Photo by John Rogers

Photo by John Rogers

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, musician and Making Music host James Everest shares his perspective on Friday night’s concert by Craig Taborn. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

Great performances can capture an audience, delivering us into the realm of pure presence – where an artist’s careful attention to their craft brings us deeply into their world – their choices and intention, moment to moment – where the sustained intensity of their artistry burns so bright that it can bring together and transport an entire hall full of people into a different place.

Minnesota native Craig Taborn’s concert in the Walker’s McGuire Theater on Friday night was titled “Heroic Frenzies,” referencing his myriad influences and his considerable performative versatility, qualities fully displayed on this great 3-part bill, which did just that – brought an entire room together, and ultimately, to its feet.   The packed house got a concert perfect for the McGuire space – primarily acoustic instruments, amplified just enough to fill the space, leaving ample room for the entire theater to reverberate with the sounds and spaces created on stage.

From the moment he stepped from the wings, Taborn commanded our attention – taking a brief bow, then quickly taking his seat at the grand piano, back to the house, pausing for a short breath before easing into the first of three solo pieces which opened the evening. The house was silent and attentive, and Taborn quietly set the tone with a mesmerizing, meditative opening section built upon a delicately repeated left hand figure that he deftly coaxed into subtle variations. Taborn’s penchant for blending classical and jazz sensibilities was immediately clear as melodies and rhythms would straighten then swing, with a constantly shifting harmonic arc.  Alternately stately and playful, with growing intensity, his first song shifted into a B section of cascading right hand runs, then slid back to the first section seamlessly.

When he ended this first piece, there was a pause, as he sat still at the piano, and the audience sat quietly, transfixed, not sure if it was over, waiting for whatever next note would come, and just as one person began to clap. Taborn began the second piece, a bluesy stomp that exhibited his hyper dexterous technique, crossing hands effortlessly, with the sharpest sense of groove and swing, head nodding.  When that second piece ended, there was less doubt, and the audience seized the chance to respond, bursting with applause and cheers.  Still intent and focused, Taborn dove right into the third solo piece, after which, he spun on his bench and accepted the thunderous cheers from the crowd, looking to the wings for his bandmates in Junk Magic to take the stage, triggering a spoken word sample that played as they took their places.

Dave King (drums) and Erik Fratzke (electric bass) are based in the Twin Cities and have played together for many years, most notably in legendary jazz group Happy Apple, and King grew up with Taborn in Golden Valley before Taborn left for college in Michigan. (They recently teamed with fellow GV native Reid Anderson from The Bad Plus to form an “Instrumental Pop” group Golden Valley Is Now.)  Junk Magic combines Taborn with King and Fratzke, plus NYC based Chris Speed on tenor sax and Matt Maneri on viola to play Taborn’s fusionist electro groove compositions. For this wide palette, all players but Speed electronically altered their instruments: Fratzke and Maneri each ran their strings through chains of effects pedals, King added electronic sampling drum triggers and pads, and Taborn played 3 different electric keyboard /synths, in addition to a collection of effects and sampler modules.

The opening spoken poem sample gave the group a chance to add color and texture underneath, creeping in with layered ambience, easing our ears into this wider sonic spectrum from the solitary world of the grand piano. As the first tune began to take shape and the spoken sample ended, the viola and sax began making long, snaking lines together, often swerving into microtonal harmony, as King, Fratzke, and Taborn began to coax a groove into place, one accent at a time.

The Junk Magic set had an exuberant intensity that no doubt came partly from the fact that Junk Magic hadn’t played together in 3 years. They were all stepping out and listening carefully, an ensemble of 5 individuals who clearly loved the opportunity to create something brand new on stage, with much room to stretch out and improvise within the structures of Taborn’s songs. There was a palpable sense of anticipation as each song spontaneously came to life and each player added their voice, carefully layering harmonies and accents with an immediate, visceral joy.  In particular, the viola and sax often played with each other or directly off each other, a unique tonal hybrid – the breath and the bow – to deliver many of the melodies.  Urgent distortion on the viola, a slide on the electric bass, laid on Fratzke’s lap, the original Fisher Price Happy Apple joining the parade of King’s percussion toys – all provided textures, while Taborn carefully provided a glue with chords and tones from his affected keyboards.   But because of the intense focus of each player, each fresh moment of each song unfolded with the thrill of a collective discovery – new territory for players and audience alike – and continued to build the larger energy and focus in the room.

The final section of the night commenced after intermission when Craig Taborn’s Trio took the stage – Gerald Cleaver on drums, Thomas Morgan on upright bass, and Taborn back on the grand piano.  In contrast to Junk Magic, the Trio has been playing much more together, and more recently, as they’ve just released a new CD Chants, and it showed in their playing. The music stands from the Junk Magic set were gone. The trio wasn’t reading any charts. Where Junk Magic felt like 5 individuals playing together, the trio felt like a single entity, symbiotically connected to their songs and each other on a highly intuitive, intimate level.  Their set began with long pauses, dramatic waiting, suspense and suspended moments that made their connections clear when they would resolve them so masterfully – shifting emphasis from one player to the next, a single voice from three instruments.  It was clear in the space they gave each other, in the easy shifts between styles – heavy groove to Ellington-esque majesty – that they had total command of their material and their ensemble expression.

One particular highlight came when Taborn ended a solo piano section with a chord that he held extra long with the piano’s sustain pedal – and as the chord slowly faded away, ringing throughout the theater, we were all following its slow arc when Morgan entered with a gentle, brief bass note, allowing us to hear the last strains of the piano, then adding a few more plucks, and slowly building his own bass sequence, which, at its apex was joined suddenly yet assuredly by Cleaver’s light funky rim and high hat pattern, sending the groove into orbit for Taborn to jump back in.  So much space given, and yet so tight together!

You could feel the hometown pride in the audience grow as the evening progressed, culminating in the standing ovation that brought them out for a sweet, short encore. Through three diverse sets of music, Taborn and his cohorts held our attention and brought us to new places we were thrilled to have been.

Fatou: A Voice of Mali’s New Generation

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, Paul Harding shares his perspective on Friday night’s concert by Fatoumata [...]

Photo by Youri Lenquette

Photo by Youri Lenquette

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, Paul Harding shares his perspective on Friday night’s concert by Fatoumata Diawara. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

Bathed in warm lights on the Cedar Cultural Center‘s stage, strumming a red angular electric guitar suitable for an Eighties hair band, the gorgeous Fatoumata Diawara gently builds a groundwork for the evening’s performance. Backed by bass, drum kit, and lead guitar, she is undoubtedly the focus, singing in an occasionally raspy voice. She wears red and yellow head scarfs, dark lipstick, a wide beaded necklace, yellow shoulder-baring top, and a fuzzy short skirt. Her band wears matching red shirts and black vests.

A perfect invitation into African music for uninitiated Western ears, she offers more familiar elements of singer-songwriter pop than potentially challenging traditional sounds, but still her melodies and language are at least rooted in the traditions of Mali — particularly in the moments when her voice conveys a flash of the wassoulou singing of her mentor Oumou Sangaré, who played years ago at the Walker.

Her commentary, however, didn’t fail to offer challenges, giving context to her songs. Addressing issues such as arranged marriage, the topic of her hit “Bissa,” she explained that she had unconventionally chosen her husband based on love.

She spoke of the “serious problem” Mali has had in the last two years, where fundamentalist Muslims “want us to sing only god” and have banned all other music. Suggesting that traditional music and the rich heritage of Mali’s instruments are about joy in the moment of this life on earth versus the promise that religions offer, she declared living life through the heritage of Africa’s music “the first religion.”

Love for tradition and a desire for progress dance together at every moment of Diawara’s performance. She spoke of the ability of traditional instruments of Mali to speak a language, yet ironically, only briefly did one appear on the stage, seemingly for show more than to speak or sound.

Pan-Africanism held the focus while the band played a bubbling groove. Fatou playfully showed variations of dance common in different regions of Africa sharing this rhythm — from the shoulder movement in Ethiopia’s style to rapid pelvic Congolese moves — representing a uniting potential across Africa.

The forward-looking star pleaded for peace in her land and everywhere, expressing love for all humanity, united with red blood regardless of skin color.

Fully embracing the West, Fatou reveres her heritage, yet shows an affinity with modern chic. Exposing tattoos on her shoulder blades and a pierced lower lip, and mixing traditional dress accessories with fun fashion, she expresses herself visually as much as the through produced tone and composition of her songs.

Fitting well alongside other Malian artists like SMOD or Amadou and Mariam, Fatou is continuing the long interplay of African music with Western pop. As she suggested, this is music representing the new generation of Mali — an aesthetic of popular song mixed with a respect for tradition and a vision of peace.

If you missed the show, or want to hear it again, the entire performance is available for streaming on KFAI here, where it aired Saturday night.

Immersive and Surreal: Julia Holter at the Walker

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions (it doesn’t reflect the opinions of the Walker or its curators). Today, Sean Donovan shares his perspective on Thursday night’s second Sound Horizon performance from LA musician Julia Holter. Agree or disagree? [...]

Julia Holter, Photo: Sean Donovan

Julia Holter. Photo: Sean Donovan

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions (it doesn’t reflect the opinions of the Walker or its curators). Today, Sean Donovan shares his perspective on Thursday night’s second Sound Horizon performance from LA musician Julia Holter. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!

Remember in the television show Twin Peaks when Julee Cruise sang that really sad song for Agent Cooper? In the scene, Cruise performs on the red-curtained stage, casting spell-binding sounds and and slowing time way down. Thursday night at the Walker (April 11), I felt a bit like Agent Cooper myself. LA musician Julia Holter drenched the museum walls with her dreamlike melodies and hypnotic storytelling.

Unassumingly shy to start, Holter gradually became more relaxed, and at one point mentioned to the audience how much she liked it there. Breaking the ice a few steps further, Holter sang an appropriate song for the moment, In the Same Room. As many us had braved the ridiculously snowy weather to get to the museum, it was comforting to hear lyrics like, “In this very room, we flew across the sea… I hope the ship will carry us there.” Housed in a wonderful setting (Bruce Nauman’s mulit-channel video installation), the dimly lit room offered a dynamic mood for Holter’s music. At the end of the song, I was left thinking, “Where will Julia carry us?”

Julia Holter, Photo: Sean Donovan

Julia Holter, Photo: Sean Donovan

Although Holter didn’t seem to physically engage on stage, her voice most certainly struck a chord, with both the room and the audience. When experiencing Holter’s music in person, it becomes very obvious how rewarding her voice sounds live; kind of a King’s College choir-boy meets Trish Keenan.

Grounding her melodies, synthesizer harmonies painted colorful backdrops and carried her songs in many wandering directions. In fact, most of her music included borrowed chords. Such exploratory harmonies captured my ears and my expectations. Although rhythmically simple, these supportive layers were extremely rich and emotional.

The five-song set covered a wide range of dynamics. At some points, we were all hushed to hear what she would do next. At others, she was launching echoed and passionate vocal ascensions and impassioned organ swells. Why Sad Song featured Wendy Carlos synth textures that builded and faded. Slowly looping layers into the mix, she then added a sensitive and humble vocal melody. This mantric repetition was touching and expansively cinematic.

Julia Holter, Photo: Sean Donovan

Julia Holter, Photo: Sean Donovan

To finish, she first thanked her extended family, who were sitting in the audience, for coming and then started into her last song. I couldn’t help connecting her mention of her family to this version of Don’t Make me Over (originally by Dionne Warwick). With lyrics like, “accept me for the things that I do, accept me for what I am,” it implicitly felt like a nod to her family. This final song was a triumphant ending to a somewhat reserved beginning. With neo-baroque harpsichords and Nico-like chants, she ended her set with a maturely optimistic mood.

As her music seemed to exist in such a whimsical world, I can image enjoying her show (even more) at a planetarium, laying down and looking up at the stars. I’d be really interested to see her later in her career when her stage presence is further developed. I wasn’t fully convinced with her engagement or her urgency.

Overall, I was impressed with her compositional creativity (both with her own work and her interpretations of other songs). Although at times, my spirit felt a bit unmoved, my ears and my imagination were profoundly mesmerized. She expressed intricate and immersive songs which were stylistically enchanting.

In the words of Twin Peaks creator David Lynch, “Ideas are like fish. If you want to catch little fish, you can stay in the shallow water. But if you want to catch the big fish, you’ve got to go deeper. Down deep, the fish are more powerful and more pure. They’re huge and abstract. And they’re very beautiful.” From what I could tell, I’d say Julia Holter is searching for the big fish.

If You Don’t Catch It, It’s Gone: Zorn @ 60

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Tuesday’s concert by John Zorn. Agree or disagree? [...]

John Zorn at Jazz Middelheim 2012 Photo: Bruno Bollaert, Flickr, used under Creative Commons license

John Zorn at Jazz Middelheim 2012
Photo: Bruno Bollaert, Flickr, used under Creative Commons license

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Tuesday’s concert by John Zorn. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

There’s something curious about having retrospectives for music and musicians, to commemorate or, perhaps worse, memorialize this music or that musician, especially since music is the ephemeral art form par excellence. This is especially true in the case of John Zorn, the subject of last weekend’s celebrations at the Walker, who has in many ways built his musical career on the most ephemeral of musics, that of improvisation in its various guises.

Herbert Marcuse once wrote that works of art can become “neutralized as a classic.” After an audience member asked him what he thought his greatest accomplishment was, he responded curtly, “I don’t think in those terms.” There is very little sense that Zorn is worried about his works becoming neutralized, if only because of his acerbic wit personality. (He launched more f-bombs in one performance at the Walker than I think I’ve heard in all the shows I’ve reviewed, combined.) And yet Zorn is well-known for celebrations of his “decade” birthdays, and the 60th is no different, with events happening around the world.

Such a juxtaposition (at best, or at worst, a contradiction) is only one that was on display at the Walker. Zorn’s yellow-inflected camo pants with the Jewish tzitzit was perhaps the most visible, but there were deeper musical things happening on the McGuire’s stage. Having never seen Zorn live before, I was struck how the dynamics of improvisation and composition, freedom and control played out through the day’s concerts, which drew on music from his earliest game pieces (Hockey, Cobra) to more recent works (released by groups Nova Express and The Concealed).

There were only two pieces in the evening where Zorn wasn’t on stage: Marc Ribot’s performance of excerpts from The Book of Heads, where he used all manner of objects (including balloons!) on his frayed guitar that looks like it had seen many performances of this particular Zorn work, and Erik Friedlander’s gorgeous solo cello arrangements of pieces from Zorn’s Book of Angels series.

Zorn himself only played on two pieces, Hockey (an early game piece) and, one of the highlights of the entire festival, a blistering live score to Wallace Berman’s cut-up film Aleph. Zorn’s contribution was skronky-as-hell alto sax runs, Kenny Wollesen on drums (where he is equally impressive, though he spent most of the night on the vibes), and Greg Cohen. Given the applause afterwards, this was what many folks in the audience were waiting for (including one heckler who had earlier questioned Zorn as to where his sax was; the response he got from the sax’s owner was characteristically Zorn: “At home, motherfucker.”)

More often than not, though, Zorn was a conductor of the various ensembles that took the stage, even some that didn’t necessarily need a conductor. Conducting and leading for Zorn is just as much of an active role as the musicians making the sounds that make up the music. For perhaps his best-known work, Cobra, he was conductor, signal caller, and ringleader all rolled into one, holding up various cards and signaling to musicians what to play and when. Yet the musicians (which included Twin Cities improvisers Michelle Kinney on cello and Joey Schad on keyboards) could also choose who they wanted to play with (or sometimes against) and could even assume the role of conductor by donning a piece of headwear. As the musicians moved through four movements, sometimes cacophonous, sometimes luminescent, it seemed that Zorn struck an incredible melding of both the fun of the best sports moments with the intellectual exercise and reward of avant-garde improvised music.

Yet I think his presence for groups like the often-manic, Klezmer-influenced jams of the Masada Trio (comprised of Friedlander, violinist Marc Freedman, and bassist Greg Cohen), in which he sat on the ground in front of them calling out tempos and pointing at musicians for solos, backgrounds, and other musical sections, speaks more of a desire—or perhaps need—for control. Later in this same set, the larger band Bar Khokba took the stage, and again Zorn was just off to the side, sitting with score in front of him,  calling out tempos and solos much the same way he did with the Masada Trio. Yet here he was even more precise in his demands and gestures, at one point even telling what specific pattern the drummer Joey Baron should play.

In all of these instances, though, Zorn and the musicians playing his music look like they’re having the time of their life. Especially Joey Baron. The smile on Baron’s face was only eclipsed by the bulging neck muscles as his arms catapulted to the different parts of his set. One of my great joys in life is seeing really joyful musical collaboration and connection in live improvised music performance, and the relationship between Zorn, his musicians, and between the musicians themselves, was absolutely thrilling. And the person who seemed to be having the most fun on-stage was often Zorn himself.

Why do musicians like this arrangement? None of these musicians need a conductor or bandleader, at least not in any conventional sense. Perhaps it frees them to explore their own improvisational capacities without necessarily having to worry about the dynamics of the “piece,” i.e. doing this for this many bars, that for that many bars, etc. Or they can avoid deciding things like solo order, length, etc before the performance, meaning that each performance has a greater feel of spontaneity. There is also a deep sense of care from Zorn towards his musicians. At one point, Wollesen wanted one of the stage crew to get him a towel and, until that happened, Zorn kept checking on him until someone handed him that towel.

Despite so much emphasis on collaboration and creation with other people, the festival ended with Zorn having, in many ways, the ultimate exercise of musical power and control. Sitting at the organ console at St. Mark’s, an eerie blue-green light casting upwards from the music stand, he played towering block chords, Bach-like chorales, and pedal tones that barely registered as “notes” but shook the cathedral’s fixtures and pipe enclosures, making the entire building his rhythm section.

Ending the concert in a more traditionally sacred space seems to bring the juxtapositions and contradictions of the evening to a head. While what Zorn created on the organ was certainly keeping in his iconoclastic character, and most likely tones, clusters, and foundation-shaking pedal tones are not usually played on this particular organ, there still was a sense of reverence, if not for the space, than for what the music makes the space become. In conversation with curator Phillip Bither at the start of the festival, Zorn spoke of the ritual, magic, and purity of music that works—and works for—a higher plane of knowledge and truth, even if that truth might only be a fleeting moment, in a basement studio, a multimillion dollar stage, or a towering cathedral, and even after 60 years.

Sky-Pointed Incantations and Synesthetic Sounds: Nate Wooley at the Walker

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions (it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators). Today, Sean Donovan shares his perspective on Thursday night’s first Sound Horizon [...]

Nate Wooley, Photo: Nicola Carpenter

Nate Wooley    Photo: Nicola Carpenter

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions (it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators). Today, Sean Donovan shares his perspective on Thursday night’s first Sound Horizon performance from trumpeter Nate Wooley. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!

To launch this year’s Sound Horizon series of live music performed in the Walker galleries, vanguard trumpeter Nate Wooley gave three 20-minute performances the evening of March 21 within Bruce Nauman‘s seven-channel video projection installation MAPPING THE STUDIO II with color shift, flip, flop, & flip/flop (Fat Chance John Cage). My recollections of the experience:

It’s a few minutes before Wooley’s performance. As I enter the room, I choose to sit in a small folding chair (instead of the pillow discs on the floor). Eyes closed, Wooley is sitting hunched inward with his trumpet, perhaps meditating/centering before he begins. My senses start to adjust to the dim light, the echoes of audience whispers, the slight breeze circulating the cave-like space. While multicolored projections show us night-time footage of Nauman’s studio, the large white-walled Walker room houses a simultaneous vibe of anxious surveillance and calming spaciousness. Unlit, Wooley is in a chair on top of a small boxed platform in the center of the room surrounded by 20-30 audience members. In addition to his trumpet, he sits next to his amplifier, a few microphones, a rubber mute, and a digital sound-effecting foot pedal.

After a brief introduction from Walker curator Doug Benidt, applause, and an anticipatory silence from the audience, Wooley slowly breaths into a sustained and steady pitch. This single note lays down a “home-base” for this exploratory sonic journey. What started as a soft and simple unwavering tone begins to crescendo into a fully enveloping chorus of timbred variations. The multiplications of all of these wave-shapes build up a dense sonic mass of overtones. I look around the room and notice many people beginning to close their eyes with the musician.

Nate Wooley, Photo: Nicola Carpenter

Nate Wooley    Photo: Nicola Carpenter

While continuing a circular breath, Wooley gradually adds a mute to the equation. He begins to bend the pitch and articulate falling phrases. From this moment forward, my mind goes into a synesthetic mode of imagery and stories. I start to hear mournful elephants and lumber being cut. Next, he transitions into rapid and repetitive trill patterns (see Rachmaninov’s Flight of the Bumblebee). These anxious calls steer the performance into a more dissonant place.

After this energetic build, Wooley suddenly removes his mouthpiece with one swift movement (and puts a contact microphone in the bell of his trumpet) and the energy collapses. Still maintaining  his breath, he begins to build a new theme. This time, relaxing and percussive sounds of “wooooosh” followed by “thuddd.” I am now envisioning water drops after a storm, parking garage squeaks, the sounds of one’s brain within their skull. Now I’m thinking, “Can a trumpet really do this?” Combining blowing, valve pressing, sucking, with other abstract noises I start to hear something between the IDM beats of Aphex Twin and mouth sounds of Bobby McFerrin. This percussive section builds and Wooley starts to add subtle and distorted falsetto singing into his trumpet. Now, I’m hearing semi-trucks pass and someone singing in the shower.

For the final section of his performance, Wooley slowly arches his arms and trumpet to point up toward the ceiling. This ending crescendo mimics frenzied rhinoceri, racing motorcycle gangs, colliding glaciers, and speeding airplanes. I (and I imagine the whole audience as well) am in awe at his endurance and passion. After minutes of commanding breath and exhausting a whirlwind of sounds into the sky, it was suddenly over. Wooley snapped out of character, smiled to the audience, and we clapped in appreciation, yet I was preoccupied with trying to digest what I had just been hit with. Although very mesmerized by the skills and techniques used for such a marathon of a performance, I was even more captivated by the variety of dynamics, stories, and emotions. All in all, a great start to this season’s Sound Horizon!

Kyle Abraham: Sparkle and Plenty

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, Penelope Freeh shares her perspective on Thursday night’s Live! The Realest MC by Kyle [...]

Photo by Ian Douglas

Photo by Ian Douglas

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, Penelope Freeh shares her perspective on Thursday night’s Live! The Realest MC by Kyle Abraham / Abraham.In.Motion. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in Comments!

A golden child is hatched downstage right. Clad in sequins and lamé, Kyle Abraham is born. Shoulders articulate. Limbs elongate then shrink. Abraham tentatively balances on his sickled feet and, for a moment, he is grown.

Soon other dancers enter and athletically frame him. Their movements are clear-cut and concise. Everything is clean and visible. The oscillation from casual hip-hop to balls-to-the-wall contemporary dance is utterly discernable, readable.

Photo by Cherylynn Tsushima

Photo by Cherylynn Tsushima

There is so much unison dancing that when an image stops for a moment, like when a trio of men sightlessly hug/spoon and reach for one another’s hands, we sit up and take notice. There is depth of meaning here that extends beyond the virtuosity of high battements and multiple turns. This piece is about coming of age, being gay, pain and rage.

Video is projected on an upstage curtain of floor to ceiling white strips. Kids chase after someone over and over, a childhood nightmare played out larger than life and in color. The music is drone-like and full of static, at times too loud but to a point. Life is sometimes unbearable and dangerous. You want to cover your ears and hide away.

At about the halfway point this full-evening piece breaks apart. Humor finds its way in by way of a video of a southern white woman giving a hip-hop tutorial. Next is a voiced-over dance lesson all about the hips. Later two men physicalize the same dance instructions, one effeminately and the other hip-hop style. A beautiful juxtaposition and, I think, complement.

The evening is comprised of episodes rather than a super-narrative. This is elegantly done and with superb transitions. The lighting helps to carry this off, creating and defining sub-spaces within the larger one.

The end brought my only complaint: I wanted the last dance episode to be a solo for Abraham. After making himself so vulnerable in a section where he by turns talked tough and broke into childhood tears, I wanted just him and his sublime musicality. Alas, I loved it anyway.

From the dancers to the clever costumes, all were well cooked. For a work that drew upon the autobiography of Abraham, credit and generous dancing time was given to the dancers.

Accumulating Paradox: Cynthia Hopkins and This Clement World

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, playwright/performer Rachel Jendrzejewski shares her perspective on Thursday night’s performance by [...]

The Arctic landscape as seen from the deck of the Noorderlicht, the ship that carried Cynthia Hopkins and the Cape Farewell expedition of 2010. Photo: Cape Farewell

The Arctic landscape as seen from the deck of the Noorderlicht, the ship that carried Cynthia Hopkins and the Cape Farewell expedition of 2010. Photo: Cape Farewell

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, playwright/performer Rachel Jendrzejewski shares her perspective on Thursday night’s performance by Cynthia Hopkins. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

Somewhere in the middle of This Clement World, we meet a German physicist that Cynthia Hopkins encountered while on an expedition to the Arctic. Or rather, I should say, we meet Hopkins’ impression of the man, as she’s reenacting a lecture that she didn’t manage to capture on film. Every year, this physicist heads to the Arctic before the ice forms, allows his boat to be frozen into place, and stays there until the ice thaws. This endeavor is known as “overwintering,” the same term used to describe things like migration and hibernation, and probably, living in Minnesota, things related to waiting out the harsh conditions of winter. Hopkins-as-physicist tells stories about living in the Arctic, navigating nature, and coming to terms with mortality, declaring choice insights along the way like, “There’s no such thing as human rights in the Arctic!” We are tiny specks in the cosmos, after all, mortal animals just fighting to survive. The audience gazes at breathtaking footage of vast seas, white ice masses, documentation collected from Hopkins’ travels, landscapes that make us feel even more insignificant in the grand scheme of things. “This is not bad, it’s not even sad,” she insists. “In fact, it’s beautiful. It’s life.”

It is beautiful; and yet this character probably will be one of the first to remind us that, despite our small, finite position within the vastness of nature, we humans are rapidly taking nature down—except, no, that’s not quite right—we’re rapidly taking ourselves down. Nature will always be around in some form, but its prolonged hospitality for human life is another story. Later in her piece, Hopkins (now playing an alien from outer space disguised as a man with a moustache) observes that human beings have come to the end of innocence; like toddlers learning about cause and effect, we can see the dire consequences of our actions. There’s no going back to blissful ignorance. Not that we have ever been terribly blissful in ignorance; another character played by Hopkins, the ghost of a murdered Native American woman, points to certain haunting notions of “progress” (“Now we can kill each other so many ways”).

Hopkins presents our current global climate situation, including the role of consumer-driven “progress,” in plain didactic terms: Here is what’s happening. We have choices to make. Now is the time to make them. Sacrifice will be required. Yet amidst the firm clarity of her mission, she inhabits a world of paradox that, at least for me, packs the real punch. Documentary film and autobiographical accounts are layered into a concert structure of utterly transcendent music (including a stellar live band), along with a multimedia environment and array of eclectic fictional and real characters. Observations of crisis exist in meditative suspension, urgency amidst timelessness. Sometimes there’s a palpable tension between these worlds; engulfing sections of music accompanied by those equally captivating Arctic images seem to swell up in visceral response to all the scientific research telling us things most of us have heard but feel helpless to control. Apart from the video, Hopkins herself is the main focus on stage, often in the form of and/or accompanied by life-sized projected videos of herself. Her image seems to be everywhere and vulnerable, but also nowhere, mediated by technology or hidden behind personae (surely the fact that she’s appearing on the heels of Cindy Sherman is no coincidence). Witness versus participation; inevitability versus choice. It accumulates very quickly into something much larger than one human.

“She’s trying to tell a story she do not know how to tell,” remarks Hopkins-as-alien toward the end. And maybe this accumulation of paradox, the impossibility of fathoming the world on our own, becomes the point. Perhaps the real story of climate change begins as we find each other in shared space to look, and listen, and respond, together.

Flying Neutrinos and Picket Lines: Shara Worden at SPCO

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Tuesday’s concert by Shara Worden. Agree or disagree? [...]

Photo by Murat Eyuboglu

Photo by Murat Eyuboglu

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Tuesday’s concert by Shara Worden. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

Shara Worden has a voice that doesn’t seem like it should emanate from the body it’s housed in. Or perhaps it’s the other way around: her body can’t contain her voice. Worden and drummer Brian Wolfe played an hour long My Brightest Diamond set for a crowd gathered at the Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra’s music room, a crowd that expected to hear yMusic along with Worden. Due to the ongoing labor dispute between the SPCO and the orchestra’s management, however, yMusic was unable to perform because of union solidarity or union obstructionism, depending on your point of view.

Dressed in a white tuxedo coat, sequined black pants, and oversized bow tie, Worden cut an amalgamated figure: shades of Annie Lennox, Brian Setzer, Pee Wee Herman, and Stop Making Sense all were visible. There were so many different feels and characters to the songs, often played on different instruments (ranging from mbira to autoharp to ukulele), that it verged on performative, yet superficial, pastiche.  The best moments for me were when she was more personal than persona, such as in “I Have Never Loved Someone,” an intimate love song to her two-year old son played delicately on the SPCO’s organ.

shara2

Photo by Denny Renshaw

Beyond the songs, though, the “off-stage story,” the locked-out SPCO musicians  and their effect on the concert tonight, gave the evening an element of cognitive dissonance for me. “We Added It Up,” a song ostensibly about relationship opposites told through the zero-charge neutrino particle, rang a little hollow. Having her channel Cardew or Rzewski would’ve rang equally hollow, though. In the end, the concert was a somewhat rare instance when the labor involved in music-making is revealed, the financial and negotiated realities that get people to the stage placed front and center. Worden’s music often invoked transcendence, whether it be through her music, her words, or her other-worldly voice, effortlessly flicking to notes far above the staff, but tonight, that transcendent quality brought the issues of the musical world all the more sharply into focus.

Shamans and Wizards: Glenn Kotche at the Walker

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Saturday’s concert by Glenn Kotche. Agree or disagree? [...]

Glenn Kotche. Photo: Ed Luna

Glenn Kotche. Photo: Ed Luna

To spark discussion, the Walker invites local artists and critics to write overnight reviews of our performances. The ongoing Re:View series shares a diverse array of independent voices and opinions; it doesn’t reflect the views or opinions of the Walker or its curators. Today, filmmaker and writer Justin Schell shares his perspective on Saturday’s concert by Glenn Kotche. Agree or disagree? Feel free to share your thoughts in comments!

In his introduction to Saturday night’s performance by Glenn Kotche at the McGuire, Philip Bither used language of sonic exploration to describe what the audience was about to see. Though he was mainly discussing ILIMAQ, the “drum kit opera” by John Luther Adams and peformed by Kotche that comprised the evening’s second half, both parts of the evening featured explorations of sonic and physical landscapes.

The first half of the show was a long collaborative composition between Kotche and multi-instrumentalist wizard Martin Dosh. Encircled by a full studio mixer, piano, marimba, drum kit, and a number of other keyboards, Dosh created, transformed, and reversed intricate live loops that revolved around, between, and within what Kotche played. For his part, the Wilco drummer also had a conventional drumset, a marimba, xylophone (which was bowed as often as it was struck with mallets), and a pair of bass drums that were never struck, but used only as a resonating surface for spinning, vibrating robot toys. The two artists seemed to be winding their way through the geography of their creation in perpetual motion, at times solidifying and coalescing around an understated piano melody played by Dosh that somehow tied everything together. And as the piece wound down, ending as it began with found sound conversational recordings and bowed xylophone, the robots in the back kept spinning, a lovely metaphor for the 20+ minutes of music the audience experienced.

John Luther Adams has made much of his music about and amidst the landscapes of Alaska, where he has resided since 1978, and Ilimaq is his most recent work. Written for Kotche, the piece is divided into roughly three sections, with Kotche playing on three different setups: first, a side-turned bass drum; second, a greatly-expanded drum set with multiple tuned toms; and finally a vast array of cymbals and gongs, also arranged in orders of tuning. Over the course of nearly an hour, Kotche displayed his virtuosity on all of the instruments, as his sounds were delayed and channeled by sound engineer Jody Elff though the McGuire’s speakers, creating the sense of being surrounded by drums in the middle of an icy, barren landscape. (Nearly imperceptible flickering lights in the McGuire’s ceiling even gave the impression of a starry night sky.)

Glenn Kotche. Photo: Ed Luna

Glenn Kotche. Photo: Ed Luna

For Adams, the extra-musical aspect of the piece is the “spirit journey” (the English translation of the piece’s title) of an Iñupiat, or Alaskan Inuit, shaman. Without wanting to make too reductive a characterization of the piece as new age-y romanticization of shamanism, Native or otherwise, the piece’s repetitions work to relieve the listener of the musical conventions and associations of a bass drum, ride cymbal, or a gong. I likened it to saying a word over and over until it becomes more sonic than semantic. However, in this case, the repetitions went on a bit too long, leaving me to unfortunately put this in the category of “appreciating” this music for what Adams and Kotche were going for, rather than really enjoying it.

 

Next