<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jerome Bel:  still thinking</title>
	<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/11/18/jerome-bel-thinking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dance Theater Workshop &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jerome Bel - People are still talking about it</title>
		<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/11/18/jerome-bel-thinking/#comment-19348</link>
		<dc:creator>Dance Theater Workshop &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jerome Bel - People are still talking about it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/11/18/jerome-bel-thinking/#comment-19348</guid>
		<description>[...] posts include:   Jerome Bel: still thinking by Sally Rousse The Republic of Jerome Bel by Aynsley Vandenbroucke  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] posts include:   Jerome Bel: still thinking by Sally Rousse The Republic of Jerome Bel by Aynsley Vandenbroucke  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Birch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/11/18/jerome-bel-thinking/#comment-17474</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/11/18/jerome-bel-thinking/#comment-17474</guid>
		<description>"I want to disappoint you", Bel said.  'Ninety-five percent of the shows you pay to see are terrible', he said.  Perhaps Bel is simply asserting his right to be in the majority; his right to anti-inspiration, anti-opus, anti-climax, etc.  Maybe he just fell asleep at the wheel.  Or died.  Maybe this was Bel's answer to Klunchun's refusal to 'act out death'.  Maybe Bel- unwittingly or otherwise- represented his version of the western white man's death on stage: death by malaise, or death by detachment killing us softly, and we are him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I want to disappoint you&#8221;, Bel said.  &#8216;Ninety-five percent of the shows you pay to see are terrible&#8217;, he said.  Perhaps Bel is simply asserting his right to be in the majority; his right to anti-inspiration, anti-opus, anti-climax, etc.  Maybe he just fell asleep at the wheel.  Or died.  Maybe this was Bel&#8217;s answer to Klunchun&#8217;s refusal to &#8216;act out death&#8217;.  Maybe Bel- unwittingly or otherwise- represented his version of the western white man&#8217;s death on stage: death by malaise, or death by detachment killing us softly, and we are him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
