<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the performance</title>
	<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/03/16/137/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lightsey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/03/16/137/#comment-5977</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.walkerart.org/performingarts/2007/03/16/137/#comment-5977</guid>
		<description>This comment courtesy of Sally Rousse:

Your posting about last night's performance was absolutely right on, as I see it.  I agree that the mind wanders and there are times when it's not clear why a dance is still going on when the mind returns.  But sometimes it's good to go deep, very deep into an idea.  "N.N.N.N" for example.  I understood the motif immediately and have performed it many times in James's  Moving Works" and other ballets and in Contact class.  But seeing it a second time tonight (with tall Cyril injured and ill, evidently) it was actually more enjoyable for me.  This was my third viewing, actually, since I saw it first in 2005.  Anyway, the men seemed enlivened and their performance was more subtle and precise, perhaps in order to care for/make up for poor Cyril.  And "Quintett," well, I could watch that every day until I die.  Cyril looked great, Fabrice was amazing, daring.  Normally there is a trap door that keeps sucking dancers down in and spits them back out again.  I wondered how they would accomplish this trick without a giant trap door/coffin but they did just fine with a strong guy (Fabrice) catching (mainly) Jone San Martin.  

Mainly I just really appreciated your right-on writing and aesthetic.  Except I don't understand "cold"--no matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment courtesy of Sally Rousse:</p>
<p>Your posting about last night&#8217;s performance was absolutely right on, as I see it.  I agree that the mind wanders and there are times when it&#8217;s not clear why a dance is still going on when the mind returns.  But sometimes it&#8217;s good to go deep, very deep into an idea.  &#8220;N.N.N.N&#8221; for example.  I understood the motif immediately and have performed it many times in James&#8217;s  Moving Works&#8221; and other ballets and in Contact class.  But seeing it a second time tonight (with tall Cyril injured and ill, evidently) it was actually more enjoyable for me.  This was my third viewing, actually, since I saw it first in 2005.  Anyway, the men seemed enlivened and their performance was more subtle and precise, perhaps in order to care for/make up for poor Cyril.  And &#8220;Quintett,&#8221; well, I could watch that every day until I die.  Cyril looked great, Fabrice was amazing, daring.  Normally there is a trap door that keeps sucking dancers down in and spits them back out again.  I wondered how they would accomplish this trick without a giant trap door/coffin but they did just fine with a strong guy (Fabrice) catching (mainly) Jone San Martin.  </p>
<p>Mainly I just really appreciated your right-on writing and aesthetic.  Except I don&#8217;t understand &#8220;cold&#8221;&#8211;no matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
