<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save Polaroid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2008/04/02/save-polaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2008/04/02/save-polaroid/</link>
	<description>Just another Walker Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:54:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>walker_blogs</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2008/04/02/save-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>GW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2008/04/02/save-polaroid/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  Me thinks top artists such as Chuck Close, Lucas Samaras and Mike Slack will actually be cut some &#039;Slack&#039; by the Polaroid Copany and be allowed to continue to receive film and whatever goodies they require.  Great publicity for the company, you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Me thinks top artists such as Chuck Close, Lucas Samaras and Mike Slack will actually be cut some &#8216;Slack&#8217; by the Polaroid Copany and be allowed to continue to receive film and whatever goodies they require.  Great publicity for the company, you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen E</title>
		<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2008/04/02/save-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2008/04/02/save-polaroid/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Polaroid&#039;s not going away, it&#039;s transforming...

Chuck Close and the guys will need to get used to the landscape format and mourn the square.



ANNE EISENBERG, NY TIMES April 13, 2008:

This fall, the company [Polaroid] expects to market a hand-size printer that produces color snapshots in about 30 seconds.



Beam a photograph from a cellphone to the printer and, with a gentle purr, out comes the full-color print -- completely formed and dry to the touch.



The printer, which connects wirelessly by Bluetooth to phones and by cable to cameras, will cost about $150. The images are 2 inches by 3 inches, the size of a credit card. The new printers are so lightweight that a Polaroid executive demonstrating them recently had three tucked unnoticeably into various pockets of his trim jacket, whipping them out as if he were Harpo Marx.



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/technology/13novel.html?scp=1&amp;sq=polaroid&amp;st=nyt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polaroid&#8217;s not going away, it&#8217;s transforming&#8230;</p>
<p>Chuck Close and the guys will need to get used to the landscape format and mourn the square.</p>
<p>ANNE EISENBERG, NY TIMES April 13, 2008:</p>
<p>This fall, the company [Polaroid] expects to market a hand-size printer that produces color snapshots in about 30 seconds.</p>
<p>Beam a photograph from a cellphone to the printer and, with a gentle purr, out comes the full-color print &#8212; completely formed and dry to the touch.</p>
<p>The printer, which connects wirelessly by Bluetooth to phones and by cable to cameras, will cost about $150. The images are 2 inches by 3 inches, the size of a credit card. The new printers are so lightweight that a Polaroid executive demonstrating them recently had three tucked unnoticeably into various pockets of his trim jacket, whipping them out as if he were Harpo Marx.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/technology/13novel.html?scp=1&amp;sq=polaroid&amp;st=nyt" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/technology/13novel.html?scp=1&amp;sq=polaroid&amp;st=nyt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
