<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MW2009 &#8211; Technology Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.walkerart.org/newmedia/2009/04/16/mw2009-technology-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/newmedia/2009/04/16/mw2009-technology-strategies/</link>
	<description>Just another Walker Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:41:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>walker_blogs</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Wyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.walkerart.org/newmedia/2009/04/16/mw2009-technology-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Wyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.walkerart.org/newmedia/?p=785#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve spent some followup time looking at the assorted AWS offerings over the last few days -- I&#039;ve got a couple of co-located boxes and then a couple dozen servers in-house for business applications. One of the co-located boxes needs to get massively updated this summer and it might just make sense to make the move to the cloud on that machine.

Secretly though, I&#039;m more interested in moving some of my business servers out of our inadequately cooled server room. Security and backups start to come into play there, especially if I include our assorted MS SQL servers, Raiser&#039;s Edge, etc.

In any case, IMA&#039;s made a strong case to consider cloud computing going forward in any project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spent some followup time looking at the assorted AWS offerings over the last few days &#8212; I&#8217;ve got a couple of co-located boxes and then a couple dozen servers in-house for business applications. One of the co-located boxes needs to get massively updated this summer and it might just make sense to make the move to the cloud on that machine.</p>
<p>Secretly though, I&#8217;m more interested in moving some of my business servers out of our inadequately cooled server room. Security and backups start to come into play there, especially if I include our assorted MS SQL servers, Raiser&#8217;s Edge, etc.</p>
<p>In any case, IMA&#8217;s made a strong case to consider cloud computing going forward in any project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
