Blogs Crosscuts

Pat O’Neill

Recently I made a joke in passing that the only way you know that either a film or filmmaker is great is if Manohla Dargis of the New York Times gives her stamp of approval. Looking back on this joke (which was neither funny nor really joke at all) I think subconsciously I was on [...]

Recently I made a joke in passing that the only way you know that either a film or filmmaker is great is if Manohla Dargis of the New York Times gives her stamp of approval. Looking back on this joke (which was neither funny nor really joke at all) I think subconsciously I was on to something. It seems after further investigation that each artist, each film Manohla writes highly about indeed stands out and fails to disappoint.

Pat O’Neill is no exception.

In November of 2004, Dargis wrote a piece following his opening at the Rosamund Felsen gallery in California.The article, titled In the Studios’ Shadow, An Avant-Garde Eye, is a pointed essay that juxtaposes his “studio life” with his personal career. Dotingly referring to him as a “filmmaker who has brushed conceptual elbows with such radically different personalities as the avant-garde pioneer Maya Deren and that consummate commercial moviemaker George Lucas,” Dargis captures the range O’Neill has that many overlook.

At UCLA, O’Neill started to make films as a graduate student of photography and design. Soon after he learned and started to use optical printing techniques to garner multiple exposures. It was his understanding of optical printing that led him to found Lookout Mountain Films and later create visual effects for Hollywood features including George Lucas’ The Empire Strikes Back.

But for O’Neill film is and was not a means to an end in the lucrative sense—film was a personal expression that explored visuals and technique, sight and sound. He is thoughtful in his construction, thoughtful of how the sound and picture of a film can capture, engulf, disturb, move and tickle the viewer. Dargis summarized a clip from O’Neill’s short Last of the Persimmons, articulating how seemingly obscure his image and sound construction can be, yet when put together, becomes pure perfection :

“As the colors shift and deepen, turning the luridly red persimmon brown, Mr. O’Neill adds some pulsing animated shapes that look like doughnuts one second, flowers the next, and seem very much to be dancing to the accompanying song, “Is It Love?” by T.Rex.”

In looking at his work, it is quite clear that his multi-disciplinary background is what makes his films stand out. He is not just a photographer, not simply a designer or filmmaker. He is a conscious amalgamation of all his mediums.

tiff08.ca

O’Neill will be in the Walker Cinema tomorrow evening , Thursday February 19, to introduce his films Trouble in the Image, Sidewinder’s Delta, and Horizontal Boundaries for the third installation of Tribute to Experimentation, Expanding the Frame. With Horizontal Boundaries, O’Neill interprets the landscapes of Los Angeles and enhances this multilayered portrait with a new soundtrack and a dazzling 35mm print. In Sidewinder’s Delta, a title from the Walker’s Ruben/Bentson Film and Video Study Collection, optical printing is used to combine original material with images drawn from found films. Rounding out the program is Trouble in the Image, a multilayered work that took more than a decade to complete.

Each of these three films poignantly uses the respected medium to convey something, anything, and perhaps everything to the viewer.

The Art and Films of Bruce Conner

The second installation of Expanding the Frame: Tribute to Experimentation rapidly approaches – next Thursday, February 12, 2008. Unlike Bruce McClure’s live Projection Performance, the second evening of Experimentation (also a Target free Thursday) focuses on the works of Bruce Conner, through a screening of his work and conversation between Film/Video curator Sheryl Mousley and [...]

from diagnolthoughts.com

The second installation of Expanding the Frame: Tribute to Experimentation rapidly approaches – next Thursday, February 12, 2008. Unlike Bruce McClure’s live Projection Performance, the second evening of Experimentation (also a Target free Thursday) focuses on the works of Bruce Conner, through a screening of his work and conversation between Film/Video curator Sheryl Mousley and alum Walker curator Joan Rothfuss.

Writer Richard Brautigan compared him to a bowl of Corn Flakes, and often Conner claimed to not be himself – famously going an extended period of time without allowing photos taken of him, which allowed for him to send other’s to screenings, openings, etc. as Bruce Conner.

Commonly noted as a filmmaker, Bruce Conner cannot be pigeonholed in one artistic genre. He may, actually, have dismissed the title of artist all together. At the beginning of my search into the life of Bruce Conner, I started with little prior knowledge and found myself completely enamored with the man by the end of my journey

In 1999, the Walker Art Center assembled a large-scale, monographic exhibition of Conner’s work titled 2000 BC: The Bruce Conner Story Pt. II. The exhibition’s catalogue- written mostly by Joan Rothfuss, Peter Boswell, and Bruce Jenkins – is by no means small, giving way to the momentous body of Conner’s work.

This past October, Bruce Jenkins wrote a reminiscent obit piece in Artforum about Conner. One section of the article seemed to correlate Conner’s work and the coincidence/chance of the reception of his work that I found the anecdote to almost be in tandem with his creations.

“The large-scale monographic exhibition mounted in 1999 by the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis, for example, was titled to suggest a different date of presentation (2000) and, more puzzlingly, was subtitled The Bruce Conner Story Part Two. When the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago placed the 2000 BC exhibition catalogue on its sales counter, it felt compelled to post a sign stating, THERE IS NO PART ONE. Adding to the confusion about the scope of this large show, Conner insisted that the front endpaper of the catalogue bear an embossed seal declaring (not just once, but twice) NOT A RETROSPECTIVE.” -Bruce Jenkins, Artforum

Also interesting background is Joe Beres’ previous post on here after Conner’s death this past summer.

Because I cannot link video of Conner’s work to prove just how worth while it is, I will leave with a quote about his work:

“…But whatever the subject or mood of particular films, the driving force in Conner’s work seems to me to be an ecstasy that is generated by his being able to recycle even the most banal commercial and industrial film imagery into new works that are not only dense and sophisticated but also accessible to almost any viewer. ” -Scott Macdonald, A Critical Cinema

Needless to say, his work is unforgettable.

The Art and Films of Bruce Conner

Thursday February 12, 2009 7:30 pm